Judges will read and pre-score all entry forms, considering any supporting materials submitted.
Judges will be asked to give a score for each question within the entry form, as listed in the bullet points below. These will be combined to give an overall score for each entry.
All judges pre-scores will then be combined and the highest-scoring entries will determine the shortlists.
Judges will meet to discuss the highest-scoring entries and then agree on the winner for each category. The awards will be judged by some of the biggest names in digital marketing.
Click here to see this year’s judging panel.
Judging session – 7th August 2024
Shortlist announcement – 9th August 2024
Entries should not exceed 1000 words in total and should relate to work undertaken between March 2023 – July 2024
CAMPAIGN AWARDS
Please complete the following sections providing details of the campaign or project that you are entering. Please note entries must not exceed a total word count of 1000 words in this section.
All information provided will remain confidential to the judges before and after the event and will not be shared with anyone outside of the judging panel allocated to review your entry.
- Objective(s) & budget (1-10 points)
Tell us what you were looking to achieve from the campaign and any targets that were set. We recommend showing targets as quantifiable metrics e.g., ‘Increase conversions from 150 to 300 a month’ rather than ‘Increase conversions by 10%’.
Please include a breakdown of implementation costs, staffing costs, agency fees etc. All elements of the entry form are confidential, and judges will not share this information. If you are unable to provide a detailed budget breakdown, please include the financial band your budget is within along with the percentage budget allocated for staffing costs, agency fees and media spend etc.
- Target audience and strategy (1-10 points)
Please provide us with details about the audience you were targeting and your overall strategy to reach them as well as the strategy to meet the overall objectives.
- Implementation and creativity (1-10 points)
Please give us a detailed explanation of your implementation of the campaign. Include screenshots to help us visualize campaigns. Provide information on the creativity of the campaign.
Details of any challenges faced and how these were overcome (1-10 points)
What challenges were unique to you and how have you overcome them? What was the end result of overcoming these challenges?
- Results & evaluation (1-10 points)
Please relate these to the objectives and targets stated above. Provide actual numbers rather than percentages wherever possible.
- Why should your campaign win? (1-10 points)
What do you think sets your campaign apart from the other campaigns being judged? Judges will in particular be looking for the thing that makes this campaign different to the others, what is unique?
URLs
Please detail any supporting documents you are including as part of your submission.
Optional – Please upload to the online entry portal when submitting this entry form.
PLATFORM/TECHNOLOGY/TOOL AWARD
Please complete the following sections providing details of the platform/tool/technology that you are entering. Please note entries must not exceed a total word count of 1000 words in this section.
All information provided will remain confidential to the judges before and after the event and will not be shared with anyone outside of the judging panel allocated to review your entry.
- Overview of Platform/Technology/Tool
Please provide the judges with a synopsis of what the tool does and how it adds value to the end user.
- Total budget
Please include costs associated with running the platform/technology/tool and how much you intend to or do sell the platform/technology/ tool for.
- Existing problems and target audience (1-10 points)
Please include details outlining the problems that this platform/technology/tool solves and how if at all these problems were previously dealt with. Entrants should detail who the target customers or users of this product are.
- USP and Features (1-10 points)
Please outline what is the platform/technology/tool’s unique proposition. Entrants should highlight the major features that are unique to the platform/technology/tool which help solve a customer problem or benefit the customer positively.
- Key Metrics (1-10 points)
Please detail what key metrics have you used to measure whether this platform/technology/tool is successful. I.e., does it save money, make things faster, generate more revenue?
Why should your Platform, Technology or Tool win? (1-10 points)
What single thing about your platform / technology / tool is not done by anyone else? What makes it stand out to be award worthy?
Please include a log in and password for numerous users to access your software.
We ask you to send a ‘Global Content Awards’ log in to allow judges to be able to test and score your product. In addition, if you’d like to provide a Demo or Video please provide the link below.
Please note if you’re unable to provide a login please contact awards@dontpanicprojects.com. Judging is based on the application form and the judges’ industry knowledge of the tools. They are a highly experienced judging panel with in-depth industry knowledge. The tool log-ins requested are for any judges who feel that want to delve deeper into any claims/functionality detailed in the entry.
Please detail any supporting documents you are including as part of your submission.
Optional – Please upload to the online entry portal when submitting this entry form.
PODCAST AWARDS
Please complete the following sections providing details of the podcast that you are entering. Please note entries must not exceed a total word count of 1000 words in this section.
All information provided will remain confidential to the judges before and after the event and will not be shared with anyone outside of the judging panel allocated to review your entry.
- Podcast overview
Please provide a brief description of the Podcast (years running, listeners etc.)
- Objective(s) & budget (1-10 points)
Tell us what you were looking to achieve from the podcast and any targets that were set. We recommend showing targets as quantifiable metrics e.g., ‘Increase conversions from 150 to 300 a month’ rather than ‘Increase conversions by 10%’.
Please include a breakdown of implementation costs, staffing costs, studio fees etc. All elements of the entry form are confidential, and judges will not share this information. If you are unable to provide a detailed budget breakdown, please include the financial band your budget is within along with the percentage budget allocated for staffing costs, studio fees and media spend etc.
- Target audience & strategy (1-10 points)
Please provide us with details around the audience you were targeting and your overall strategy to reach and engage with them, as well as the strategy to meet the overall objectives.
- Details of any challenges faced and how these were overcome (1-10 points)
What challenges were unique to you and how have you overcome them. What was the end result of overcoming these challenges?
- Results, impact & evaluation (1-10 points)
What impact has your podcast had on its listeners or the community? How do you measure the success of the podcast?
Please relate your results to the objectives and targets stated above and provide actual numbers rather than percentages wherever possible.
- Why should you win? (1-10 points)
What do you think sets your podcast apart from the other podcast’s being judged? Judges will in particular be looking for the thing that makes this podcast different to the others, what is unique?
URLs
Please detail any supporting documents you are including as part of your submission
Optional – please upload to online entry portal when submitting this entry form
AGENCY/TEAM AWARDS
Please complete the following sections providing details of the agency/team that you are entering. Please note entries can be self-nominated or nominated by a third party and must not exceed a total word count of 1000 words in this section.
All information provided will remain confidential to the judges before and after the event and will not be shared with anyone outside of the judging panel allocated to review your entry.
- Overview of the Agency/Team nominee
Please include numbers, staff turnover, roles etc. for agency and team nominations.
- Agency/Team objectives (1-10 points)
Tell us what you were looking to achieve and any targets that have been set within the agency or team to help achieve your goals. We recommend showing targets as quantifiable metrics e.g., ‘Increase conversions from 150 to 300 a month’ rather than ‘Increase conversions by 10%’.
- Recent work example(s) (1-10 points)
Please include details of recent client or campaign work. How does your recent work display creativity and make your team or agency stand out amongst others?
- Details of any recent achievements (1-10 points)
What makes your team or agency stand out? Please include details of any achievements you feel make your agency or team award-worthy. What are you proud of?
- Details of any challenges faced and how these were overcome (1-10 points)
What challenges were unique to you and how have you overcome them? What was the end result of overcoming these challenges?
- Why should your Agency/Team win? (1-10 points)
Please detail what you feel makes you stand out amongst others and why you feel your entry is award-winning. What makes you unique? What gives you the competitive edge?
URLs
Please detail any supporting documents you are including as part of your submission.
Optional – Please upload to the online entry portal when submitting this entry form.
ETHICAL, TRANSPARENT, FAIR & CONFIDENTIAL
The Global Content Awards prides itself on its ethical and transparent process and confidentiality is taken extremely seriously.
Judges are not allowed to enter any of the categories.
All judging discussions are confidential, and the material will not be shared with anyone outside of the judging panel before or after the ceremony. Judging papers will not be shared with any third parties and will be deleted immediately after the judging period. Judges can only access entries they have been asked to score.
Permission to use any material for winning case studies post-event will be sought from entrants.
